Before supporting changes to Bitcoin - especially at consensus level - I would like to get some clarification about the “desirable effects” of BIP-110.
What gain to users is achieved whether blocks are full or not? The current rules allow for only a maximum growth of the blockchain at a linear rate.
Who decides which policies to uphold? This should be the decision of each node by its own mempool policy, no?
Can you define the unneccessary costs and risks of running a node in this scenario? We should be clearly informed of these issues.
Can you demonstrate an example of payments being unfairly disadvantaged?
Thank you for your time.