# Can we get a Lightning Protocol Design Category/WG?

**URL:** <https://delvingbitcoin.org/t/can-we-get-a-lightning-protocol-design-category-wg/242>\
**Category:** Meta\
**Tags:** lightning\
**Created:** [December 4, 2023, 8:15pm UTC](https://delvingbitcoin.org/t/can-we-get-a-lightning-protocol-design-category-wg/242 "2023-12-04T20:15:00Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ajtowns](https://delvingbitcoin.org/user_avatar/delvingbitcoin.org/ajtowns/32/417_2.png) [@ajtowns](https://delvingbitcoin.org/u/ajtowns)\
**Post date:** [December 4, 2023, 8:25pm UTC](https://delvingbitcoin.org/t/can-we-get-a-lightning-protocol-design-category-wg/242/2 "2023-12-04T20:25:41Z")

</div>

If you just want something public, posting to the existing categories (implementation / protocol design) and using the #lightning tag should be fine? My impression is the fedora folks found it better to go with general categories and more specific tags on their discourse, so I think that approach should be workable? Ref: [Navigating Fedora Discussion — Tags, Categories, and Concepts - Fedora Discussion](https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/navigating-fedora-discussion-tags-categories-and-concepts/35555)

If you want a more specific workgroup I can set that up too; but need to know who should be members, if it should be private, public, or read-only public.

---

_[View the full topic](https://delvingbitcoin.org/t/can-we-get-a-lightning-protocol-design-category-wg/242)._