# Cluster Mempool RBF Thoughts

**URL:** <https://delvingbitcoin.org/t/cluster-mempool-rbf-thoughts/156>\
**Category:** Implementation\
**Tags:** wg-cluster-mempool\
**Created:** [November 1, 2023, 2:06am UTC](https://delvingbitcoin.org/t/cluster-mempool-rbf-thoughts/156 "2023-11-01T02:06:07Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 11

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![instagibbs](https://delvingbitcoin.org/user_avatar/delvingbitcoin.org/instagibbs/32/28_2.png) [@instagibbs](https://delvingbitcoin.org/u/instagibbs)\
**Post date:** [December 5, 2023, 4:01pm UTC](https://delvingbitcoin.org/t/cluster-mempool-rbf-thoughts/156/11 "2023-12-05T16:01:36Z")

</div>

Assuming these sizes are problematic, the two levers I see are cluster size, and number of allowed clusters to touch.

I think it’s less disruptive to just lower the latter to N \<\< 100?

A transaction could still conflict with up to 100 transactions per cluster, up to N clusters.

---

_[View the full topic](https://delvingbitcoin.org/t/cluster-mempool-rbf-thoughts/156)._