# CTV+CSFS: Can we reach consensus on a first step towards covenants?

**URL:** <https://delvingbitcoin.org/t/ctv-csfs-can-we-reach-consensus-on-a-first-step-towards-covenants/1509>\
**Category:** Protocol Design\
**Tags:** softfork, covenants, introspection\
**Created:** [March 10, 2025, 10:35pm UTC](https://delvingbitcoin.org/t/ctv-csfs-can-we-reach-consensus-on-a-first-step-towards-covenants/1509 "2025-03-10T22:35:25Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 21

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![stevenroose](https://delvingbitcoin.org/user_avatar/delvingbitcoin.org/stevenroose/32/1087_2.png) [@stevenroose](https://delvingbitcoin.org/u/stevenroose)\
**Post date:** [March 12, 2025, 6:14pm UTC](https://delvingbitcoin.org/t/ctv-csfs-can-we-reach-consensus-on-a-first-step-towards-covenants/1509/21 "2025-03-12T18:14:51Z")

</div>

My purpose with this thread is to avoid doing an independent activation client which will undoubtedly upset people, but instead hear everyone out and see if we can gather enough momentum to get some version of these changes deployed through the regular Core release process.

---

_[View the full topic](https://delvingbitcoin.org/t/ctv-csfs-can-we-reach-consensus-on-a-first-step-towards-covenants/1509)._