I don’t think this is true for several policies used in bitcoin core. Example: dustrelayfee
/** Min feerate for defining dust.
* Changing the dust limit changes which transactions are
* standard and should be done with care and ideally rarely. It makes sense to
* only increase the dust limit after prior releases were already not creating
* outputs below the new threshold */
static constexpr unsigned int DUST_RELAY_TX_FEE{3000};
- e0abd83b847f2fbece4150a8e9c0829e077cf3f67f7b99853f1bd44099aa4bcb
- 682a4ac064cf5e4d92b1a89c5cfecb03cc1fdd75c1ed3958f9ac8dd745b8fd63
- 62cbfded2c860c99ce24c6b862ca24cbcfbce32e506f989b76e5955435ba67c1
- 390768ff00c51f5d76b4a4919aac2120c5a718ec5a4041ba580212fc2656bfa3
- bf22ec38d253e9d0cfca4abbb9cfa21322a51d61c3319dc89441a75cd8896d62
- d90b6662c62240d87fd5cbda97f8267e877ab02c75080746fc8514bcad9f99f7
- 9ee13a3f212ee310b0814420ee1ecfbcc9fc776a57bfe97e3cfb9d3d67baae9d
- 0ce363883009ca1739e12d3f4481711b531d4ec82e5236314658a45adce023cb
- 64a333457107ef4812da605cd193c30334d35cd8e3d793c038f10c0227343c4b
- bcd831a3db1e11d5b73d4b08b99c291589d239d01aedb8f2ca28d7610c7ce83c
- c709b28927a3f0093adfb90c441e99aea1aeafc90c7ac6fbf579fcf990b74e12
- 12f67059eda9f7ace601d4ecd805841341ec3f6f2aa5e7094eae738f9896caf0