# Stats on compact block reconstructions

**URL:** <https://delvingbitcoin.org/t/stats-on-compact-block-reconstructions/1052>\
**Category:** Protocol Design\
**Created:** [August 2, 2024, 11:58am UTC](https://delvingbitcoin.org/t/stats-on-compact-block-reconstructions/1052 "2024-08-02T11:58:02Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 22

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ajtowns](https://delvingbitcoin.org/user_avatar/delvingbitcoin.org/ajtowns/32/417_2.png) [@ajtowns](https://delvingbitcoin.org/u/ajtowns)\
**Post date:** [February 5, 2025, 4:51am UTC](https://delvingbitcoin.org/t/stats-on-compact-block-reconstructions/1052/22 "2025-02-05T04:51:21Z")

</div>

> [@ajtowns](#):
>
> Not sure what it would look like in a decentralised model;

One other thing is that FIBRE is designed for UDP transmission to avoid delays due to retransmits; so redoing it over TCP via the existing p2p network would be a pretty big loss…

---

_[View the full topic](https://delvingbitcoin.org/t/stats-on-compact-block-reconstructions/1052)._