# Stats on compact block reconstructions

**URL:** <https://delvingbitcoin.org/t/stats-on-compact-block-reconstructions/1052>\
**Category:** Protocol Design\
**Created:** [August 2, 2024, 11:58am UTC](https://delvingbitcoin.org/t/stats-on-compact-block-reconstructions/1052 "2024-08-02T11:58:02Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 60

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![instagibbs](https://delvingbitcoin.org/user_avatar/delvingbitcoin.org/instagibbs/32/28_2.png) [@instagibbs](https://delvingbitcoin.org/u/instagibbs)\
**Post date:** [September 29, 2026, 12:00pm UTC](https://delvingbitcoin.org/t/stats-on-compact-block-reconstructions/1052/60 "2026-09-29T12:00:56Z")

</div>

> [@ajtowns](#):
>
> For the 6.9%, I’ve seen some laggy GETDATA responses delaying tx relay by up to a minute;

I asked a related q: did any GETDATA responses I was to send out get delayed by validation of blocks/tx, and the answer was “no” from my bot. These blocks are quite easy to verify, linear chains of small rune mints.

---

_[View the full topic](https://delvingbitcoin.org/t/stats-on-compact-block-reconstructions/1052)._
